
Caperton v. Massey Resource Page
In a 5 to 4 decision, the Supreme Court has ruled that it was unconstitutional for a state supreme court justice to hear a case involving the financial interests of a major donor to the judge's election campaign.
Justice at Stake's Bert Brandenburg issued the following statement: To see the entire Justice at Stake press release, click here. This Justice at Stake resource section contains the following:
“This is a tremendous victory. The Supreme Court said, ‘Enough is enough.’ Today’s ruling is a critical first step. But states that elect judges must get to work now, to keep campaign cash out of our courts of law.”
- A history of the case
- Campaign Spending and the Courts
- The legal debate: Highlights from U.S. Supreme Court arguments and briefs
- Recusal and Other Reforms
- Resources: Audio/video, press reports, and links
- The Grisham connection: How Caperton v. Massey helped inspire a novel
- Commentaries
- Justice at Stake's amicus brief, and the 27 groups that signed
- One-Page Fact Sheet (PDF)
- Polling Data
- Notable Quotes
Bert Brandenburg on CNN about Caperton
Home | History | Spending | Debate | Reforms | Poll | Resources | Grisham | Commentaries | JAS Brief | Quotes

