Home > Site Map Site Map Why Judicial Independence Matters   Senator John McCain Supports Justice at Stake Glossary of Key Terms   Current Issues   Judicial Accountablity Justice at Stake Campaign Comments on Draft Rule On Judicial Conduct and Disability Act Proceedings Attacks on the Courts South Dakotans to Vote on “J.A.I.L. 4 Judges” Drawing the Line on Inappropriate Criticism More Judge Wars in 2006? Getting it Right on Accountability The Courts and the "War on Christmas" The Politics of Criticizing Judges Rep. Schiff Offers "Sense of Congress" Amendment on Courts The War on the Courts: New Tools to “Punish” Judges? Conservatives Stand Up for the Courts—Not a Minute Too Soon Friend of the Court A Turning Point in the Campaign Against the Courts? A Field Guide to "Judicial Activism" The High Cost of Judicial Independence Ashcroft v. Rehnquist: Will the War on Judges Continue Under a New Attorney General? Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist's 2004 Report Battle for the Courts Panel Discussion Brown v. Board of Education: What is its Legacy for the Courts? "Judicial Activism": What Does it Even mean Anymore? Attacks on Judges: A Desk Reference Checks and Balances & Court-Stripping Wiretaps and the Constitution The Framers' Pens Crusading Against the Courts One Step Forward, One Step Back: The Executive Branch and the Courts Military Commissions The Pledge That Has Kept America Free: Strong Courts U.S. Senate Considers post-Hamdan Landscape Pledging to Uphold the Constitution Tired of Re-Runs? Politicians Aren't Check: Can They Hear You Now? Inspecting, Generally? Another Round for Mulligan Justice? Checks, Please In PATRIOT Renewal, Courts Remain on Sidelines RePATRIOTization Power Without Accountability In the War on Terror? Politics to the Nines: Will Ninth Circuit Split be Sacrifice for New Judgeships Nationwide? Stoking the Outrage Industry Courting Danger: New Report Shows Courts Losing Power During the War on Panel Discussion - Post 9/11 Limits to Judicial Review: What Role for the Courts in Counter-Terrorism Tragedy and the Courts “Mulligan Justice”: The Latest End-Run Around the Constitution Is the Courthouse Door Being Slammed on Victims of Persecution? Battle for the Courts Panel Discussion Tough on Crime, Tough on Courts -- Whatever Court-Stripping Back in Fashion as Congress, Executive Seek to Limit Power of Courts to Protect Rights Judge John S. Martin’s Speech to the 2004 Justice at Stake Summer Workshop Kennedy Commission Report Calls For End to “Mandatory Minimums” State Judicial Selection Special Interest Groups Overwhelm Candidates in Wisconsin Court Campaign Minnesota Poll: Protect Courts From New Politics of Judicial Elections Wisconsin Voters: Reform Supreme Court Races Now Vocal Minority is Drowned Out By Bipartisan Majorities in Missouri Survey Pennsylvania Supreme Court Candidates Shattering State Fundraising Record Who’s Behind the Campaign to End the Missouri Plan? Shhhh: It’s a Secret 2008 State Supreme Court Elections List A Cadillac Court Campaign in the Land of Lincoln Report on 2006 Court Campaigns Shows Spread of Special Interest Pressure New Mexico Adopts Judicial Public Financing Wisconsin is Testing Ground for New Democratic Judicial Campaign Effort Activist Judges? Missourians Say “Show Me” Ohio Governor’s Plan for Judicial Selection to Focus on Merit, Not Politics After Bruising Judicial Elections, States Embark on Reform Debates 2006 State Supreme Court Elections 2006 State Supreme Court Election Results Pro-Business Groups Dominate Airwaves in Court Races Special Interests Spending More on Supreme Court Television Advertising Washington State Supreme Court Races Getting Uglier 2006 State Voter Guides 2006 Ballot Initiatives 2006 State Supreme Court Elections Judicial Selection in the News Don’t Like That Decision? Fire the Judge! Judicial Elections in the States Kentucky Poll Shows Support for Online Voter Guide What Happens in Vegas... Kansas Rejects Politicizing Supreme Court Nominations A New Day for Judicial Elections in New York? Decision Could Open Floodgates of Money into America’s Courtrooms Coming Soon: Vote "No" on Judge [Fill in the Blank] The Next Missouri Plan The New Politics of Judicial Elections 2004: Report on State Supreme Court Elections Illinois: Voter Guide Moves Forward, Judicial Public Financing on Hold From Worst to First for Illinois? 2006 Scheduled Supreme Court Elections Exit Polls in NC: Voter Guides Help Close Knowledge Gap in Judicial Elections Battle for the Courts Panel Discussion 2004 State Supreme Court Elections Monitoring Project Feerick Commission Report Proposes Changes to NY Judicial Campaigns Special Interest Pressure on Courts Spreading, Warns Sen. John McCain & New Justice at Stake Report Judicial Reform in New York ABA Colloquium on the 21st Century Judiciary Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act Public Financing Ohio Forum on Judicial Selection Reform Justice at Stake Campaign Monitoring Project: 2002 Ballot Initiatives in Oregon--Results In.... National Polling Learn About Your State Reaction to US Supreme Court's White Decision The New Politics of Judicial Elections 2000 [PDF Report] NPJE 2006 Report Diversity on the Bench “A right which must be made available to all on equal terms”: The Special Role of the Courts in Protecting Minority Rights United States Supreme Court Courts and the War on Terror: A Summary of Recent Developments Excerpts from Chief Justice Roberts on Nightline, 11/13/06 What do the Alito Hearings Mean for the Courts? Six Stories to Watch in 2006 Alito Nomination: Showdown for Interest Groups Was Harriet Miers 'Borked'? Will Harriet Miers Stand Up for the Courts that Protect our Rights? Roberts Calls Court-Stripping "Bad Policy" as Senators Threaten Courts Senator Threatens "Innovative Ways to Limit Judiciary" Schumer Questions Roberts on Attacks on Judges Tracking Interest Group TV Ads in the Supreme Court Confirmation Battles In Hearings, Roberts Discusses Court-Stripping Senator Says Judge “Declare[s] War on All Things Religious” Justice Rehnquist's Legacy of Defending Courts From Political Attacks What Would a Justice Roberts Mean for the Power of the Courts? Eight Questions Judge Roberts Can Answer Op-Ed: Judge Roberts Should Stand Up For Courts Learn About Your State States A-K States L-N States O-W Fact Sheets   Learn About Your State   States A-K Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky States L-N Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota States O-W Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington, DC West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Fact Sheets 2008 Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Fact Sheet 2006 State Supreme Court Elections National Survey of State Judges National Public Opinion Survey Polling Summary Polling Presentation Public Financing Laws in Local Jurisdictions 2002 State Supreme Court Elections and Opponents Sample Questions for Judicial Candidates Scheduled State Supreme Court Elections and Vacancies Best Of Bibliography Justice at Stake Campaign Launch -- Press Release African American Polling Data California Polling Data Illinois Polling Data Florida Polling Data New York Polling Data Ohio Polling Data Pennsylvania Polling Data Texas Polling Data Our Uniquely Independent American Judiciary [PDF] More Resources on Diversity in State Courts African-American Representation on the Bench Hispanic Representation on the Bench   About the Campaign   Donate To Support the Justice at Stake Campaign TV Ad Campaign Partners Alabama Appleseed Center for Law and Justice American Bar Association American Board of Trial Advocates The American Judges Association American Judicature Society Appleseed Foundation American Association for Justice Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law The Campaign Legal Center (*campaign reform issues only) Campaigns for People Chicago Appleseed Fund for Justice Citizen Action/Illinois Citizens for an Independent Judiciary Committee for Economic Development Common Cause The Constitution Project Democracy North Carolina Democracy South/Georgia Project DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar The Fund for Modern Courts The Greenlining Institute The Illinois Campaign for Political Reform Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System Institute on Money in State Politics Interfaith Alliance Kansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Kansas League of Women Voters Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law League of Women Voters Judicial Independence Project Michigan Campaign Finance Network Michigan League of Women Voters Minnesota League of Women Voters Missourians for Fair and Impartial Courts National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA) National Association of Women Judges The National Bar Association National Center for State Courts National Voting Rights Institute North Carolina Center for Voter Education Ohio Citizen Action Ohio League of Women Voters Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts Protestants for the Common Good Public Campaign Tallahassee League of Women Voters Texans for Public Justice Wisconsin Citizen Action Wisconsin Democracy Campaign Justice at Stake Launches How to Participate Campaign Partners Learn About Your State Jobs and Internships Justice at Stake Campaign Internships Director of Federal Court Programs Director of Institutional Grant Development Staff Board of Directors Statement of Justice at Stake’s Board of Directors on Crisis in Pakistan The Honorable Roger Warren Cynthia Canary The Honorable Charles Clevert Pete Dunn Charlie Geyh Diana Huffmann The Honorable John Jones The Honorable Thomas Moyer The Honorable Sandra Otaka Michael Petro Gerald Torres The Honorable James Wynn Funding Contact Information   Campaign Partners   Alabama Appleseed Center for Law and Justice American Bar Association American Board of Trial Advocates The American Judges Association American Judicature Society The Society's Work A Sampling of AJS Publications Appleseed Foundation American Association for Justice Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law The Campaign Legal Center (*campaign reform issues only) Campaigns for People Chicago Appleseed Fund for Justice Citizen Action/Illinois Citizens for an Independent Judiciary Committee for Economic Development Common Cause Common Cause/OH Wins Campaign Ad Case The Constitution Project Democracy North Carolina Democracy South/Georgia Project DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar The Fund for Modern Courts The Greenlining Institute The Illinois Campaign for Political Reform Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System Institute on Money in State Politics Interfaith Alliance Kansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Kansas League of Women Voters Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law League of Women Voters Judicial Independence Project Michigan Campaign Finance Network Michigan League of Women Voters Minnesota League of Women Voters Missourians for Fair and Impartial Courts National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA) National Association of Women Judges The National Bar Association National Center for State Courts National Voting Rights Institute North Carolina Center for Voter Education Ohio Citizen Action Ohio League of Women Voters Oklahoma Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts Protestants for the Common Good Public Campaign Tallahassee League of Women Voters Texans for Public Justice Wisconsin Citizen Action Wisconsin Democracy Campaign   Resources   A List of Related Blogs Audio & Video for the Web Press Releases 11/5/08: 2008 Supreme Court Elections: More Money, More Nastiness 10/31/08: Michigan Court Race Is Nation’s Dirtiest, Watchdog Group Says 10/23/08: Buying Time - Alabama and Michigan Lead Nation’s Supreme Court Advertising 10/17/08: Judges and Campaign Cash: Will the Supreme Court Weigh In? 10/16/08: Buying Time - Supreme Court Television Advertising Drops With Only Three Weeks Left Before Election 10/9/08: Television Advertising in Louisiana’s Supreme Court Elections Smashes Record, Alabama Wars Also Turning Nasty 10/2/08: Louisiana, Alabama, and Ohio Lead TV Spending Surge in Supreme Court Races 9/26/08: This Week in Judicial Politics 9/25/08: Buying Time—Special Interests and Supreme Court Elections 9/19/08: This Week in Judicial Politics, September 12-18 9/18/08: Buying Time 2008: Alabama’s Supreme Court Election 9/18/08: New Guidelines Help Judicial Candidates Resist Special Interest Pressures 9/12/08: This Week in Judicial Politics 9/11/08: Buying Time 2008: Television Advertising in State Supreme Court Elections 9/3/08: Kansas Performance Evaluation for Judges Plan Praised by National Groups 8/12/08: Justice at Stake Praises Proposal for Bipartisan Commissions To Identify High-Quality Judges 7/22/2008: Justice at Stake Calls on Political Party to Pull Court-Bashing Ad 7/3/08: What Role for the Courts in the War on Terror? A Summary of Recent Developments 6/12/08: Justice at Stake Praises Boumediene Ruling, Points to Report on Role of Courts in Protecting Liberties 5/8/08: New Report Documents Special Interest Pressure on Midwest Courts 5/8/08: New Report Documents Special Interest Pressure on Midwest Courts 4/9/08: Special Interest Groups Overwhelm Candidates in Wisconsin Court Campaign 3/26/08: Special Interests Continue Dominance of Wisconsin Airwaves in High Court Race 3/20/08: Special Interests Dominate Wisconsin Airwaves in High Court Race 3/14/08: Justice at Stake Praises New Federal Judicial Misconduct Rules, Outlines Further Steps 2/25/08: National Groups to Speak In Favor of Supreme Court Public Financing for Wisconsin 2/19/08: National Watchdog Applauds Wisconsin Senate for Action on Supreme Court Campaign Finance Reform 1/29/08: Poll: Minnesota Voters Alarmed By Prospect of Big Money, Special Interests in Judicial Elections 1/28/08: Justice at Stake Adds Two Federal Judges to Board, Announces Staffing Changes 1/10/08: New Poll of Wisconsin Voters Show Strong Bipartisan Support for Supreme Court Campaign Reform 12/11/07: New Poll of Missouri Voters: Nonpartisan Court Plan Has Strong Bipartisan Support 12/11/07:Missouri Memo and Overall Results 12/5/07: Balance Between Impartiality and Accountability is Focus of New Blog from Justice at Stake 12/4/07: Ahead of Major High Court Case, Justice at Stake Report Highlights Role of Courts in Wartime 12/3/07: Wisconsin Poised to Become National Leader on Judicial Reform 11/14/07: Justice at Stake Adds Former GM Counsel to Board, Announces Expansion of Partnership to 50 11/6/07: Pennsylvania High Court Campaigns Dominated By Big Money, Special Interests 10/12/2007: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Candidates Raise Over $5 Million, Shattering State Fundraising Record 10/11/07: Justice at Stake Campaign: Five States to Watch in 2008 9/25/07: Civic Groups Advise Pennsylvania Voters: Retention Elections Require Careful Consideration 9/14/07: Constitution Day Provides Opportunity to Emphasize Dedication to Fair and Impartial Courts 9/13/07: The War on Fair and Impartial Courts: Iowa Judge Latest Target of Special Interest Attacks 05/21/07: National Report Highlights Missouri Trial Court Campaign Targeted By Special Interest Group 05/18/07: The Supreme Court's Upcoming Hein Decision 05/17/07: Report Shows Spread of Special Interest Pressure, Growing Clout of Business Groups in State Supreme Court Elections 05/17/07: Report on Supreme Court Elections Highlights Success of NC's Public Financing System 05/17/07: Alabama Supreme Court Races Dominate National Report 05/17/07: National Report Shows Georgia Supreme Court Campaign Among Nastiest, Most Expensive in 2006 05/17/07: National Report Shows Independent Expenditures Defined 2006 Washington Supreme Court Races 05/14/07: Media Advisory: New Politics of Judicial Elections 2006 04/13/07: New Mexico Acts to Protect its Judicial Elections From Special Interest Influence 04/13/07: New Mexico Acts to Protect its Judicial Elections From Special Interest Influence 04/03/07: Special Interests the Only Winners in Wisconsin’s Record-Shattering Supreme Court Race 03/02/07: Will the Georgia Supreme Court Get Trapped in Washington Politics? 02/21/07: Quie Commission Recommendations Could Help Minnesota Avoid Nasty Judicial Elections 01/29/07: National Judicial Reform Groups Laud Ohio Governor’s Plan to Fill Court Vacancies Based on Merit, Not Politics 01/25/07: Early Interest Group Activity Signals Messy, Expensive Supreme Court Race Ahead 11/17/06: Despite High Spending, Special Interest Groups Not Entirely Successful in Supreme Court Elections